…. in order to see a photograph well, it is best to look away or close your eyes

Roland Barthes, Camera Lucida

I have created this blog, searchingtosee, as a space for me to think and write about photography and its role in the modern world. I will use it to share my ideas and pictures, and those of others which inspire me. My focus in particular is to think about the role of the photographic image in everyday life, and to search for a particular aesthetic which I will call phenomenological. Heidegger wrote about ‘being in the world’ as his epistemological concern in Being and Time; he wanted to explore the world in relation to our experience in it as human beings, to our interaction with the things around us. This contextualising of human experience seems to me to be a helpful way to approach  photography since we can little understand much about the world we live in without first appreciating our context or ‘mode of givenness’ as Husserl describes it. The way I interpret this is as a kind of philosophy of relativity. All experience is experience to someone according to a particular manner of experiencing. To bring this back to photography (for those of you who are wondering where on earth I am going with this): just as our being (our mind, thought, actions) are deeply grounded in the world, our context of living, and therefore cannot be considered separately from this context (i.e. our history, emotions, experiences), so a photograph is not simply an image in isolation. As I hope the story of my dad in my previous page illustrated, a photograph is a complex relationship between subject, object, time, mood and understanding, which all constitutes and adds to its meaning and the way that we read photographic images. So, just as it is impossible to ‘bracket’ or suspend our natural attitude from its context and all the cultural and historical assumptions which affect and direct our everyday behaviour, so a photograph, a suspended ‘moment in time’ will shift and shape its meaning and its message to us as viewer, as audience, as interpreter, dependent on the context in which is it is given to us.

(NB – Here it would be possible to go into a very lengthy – and indeed interesting – debate on the photograph’s varying social ‘contexts’ as art object, historical document, family snapshot, scientific record etc. but I will, for the moment refrain from doing so… maybe I will save that for another day!)

This blog originally started life as a notebook of pictures entitled Sehnsucht. I intended the notebook to write about the pictures and thoughts which they induced, but I find that as I never have time to sit down and look at them, let alone write, the notebook has been largely left untouched. So I am re-creating my notebook in blog form in the hope that this medium will be more accessible to me and also to others who may want to interact, comment and offer any feedback on my ideas.

Sehnsucht is a German word which we would translate as ‘longing’. It is derived from the two verbs ‘sehen’ (to see) and ‘suchen’ (to look for, or search), hence ‘searching to see’ which I quite like as an idea – a project – because this is partly what we are doing as photographers and consumers of photography: searching for a particular type of aesthetic experience. The German word is also highly evocative of a particular type of desire and longing for the unattainable which was characteristic of the German Romantics: the blue flower. A leitmotif of Romantic literature, the blue flower symbolises this longing. Novalis in his novel Heinrich von Ofterdingen describes this elusive flower which Heinrich experiences in a dream.

For me the flower is a kind of starting point and an inspiration… Perhaps the photographer’s quest is something equally elusive. She is a hunter on a continual search for something (perfection, purity, beauty, truth?) so fleeting, trace-like, as if it was something she saw once only in a dream, that continually evades her, somehow, like a sunbeam of light dancing on a grey cobbled street and bringing it – just for an instant – alive in the most beautiful way imaginable. And then she is left wondering, wanting more.

Those moments when all the elements converge to provide the perfect shot are rare gifts to the photographer as Cartier Bresson knew when he coined the famous phrase – the mantra of all documentary photographers – ‘the decisive moment’ (he also said that your first 10,000 photographs are your worst – I would probably go with that – it takes a lot of bad shots to train a photographic eye). He likened the photographer to the hunter and was one of the first pioneers of elevating the vernacular to interesting photographic material (and eventually art).

It is true that photography has the power to search out and illuminate what is usually hidden, ignored or forgotten, literally to bring it to light:

like the light, that which is bright … that wherein something can become manifest, visible in itself

Heidegger, Being and Time

Mundane, everyday life has a unique aesthetic which radiates its own kind of charming beauty. Photography has made much in common with the phenomenological approach of going back to the ‘the thing itself’ (Husserl) but the partnership, I think, goes deeper than that. Both are on a quest of an intense kind of seeing experience, to rediscover wonder in the world and place themselves in it (be it with a camera or a philosophical presence). Phenomenology also has a lot to offer us in thinking about the photograph as an object itself, a harbinger of memory, death, and social meaning. (This is a subject which Roland Barthes discusses in eloquent detail in Camera Lucida).

So the relationship between photography and phenomenology is not just about the ‘thingness’ that they have in common, but it is a shared attitude to understanding the world in terms of experience, and more importantly in terms of our experience in it. This is what, arguably, all art tries to do, but with the medium of photography there is a unique relationship of inter-dependence; we always have to come back to the thing itself, because that is where it started, where it was conceived (this is what Barthes, in Camera Lucida described as ‘the referent’ – or the thing being photographed – which cannot be divorced from the photograph itself as object, so in effect the photograph becomes its referent, and is made invisible). It came from the world and our desire to see the world around us but not just to see it – to memorise it, to record it, to search it for a deeper, hidden meaning.

© Emily Hughes and searchingtosee, 2012


9 Comments on “searchingtosee

  1. Very eloquently written. As for the “longing” associated with photography…I think that longing exists in any art form, or rather any activity that requires creativity. A longing to understand, a longing to convey, and a longing to discover.

  2. Lots to think about! My husband is a newspaper photo editor and career photographer and I also shoot photos, some of which have been published. It’s been interesting watching his eye evolve and change in what he sees and appreciates. We both love nature shots…I love anything weathered and worn, with patina.

    I hate to admit it, but have found my camera phone really frees me to snap much more and more often. I love the spontaneity of it.

    • Just re-reading this I have realised I went all around the houses with this! Not sure I explained myself particularly well but I guess my ideas on the subject are not yet ‘fully formed’ so to speak, but yes there is lots to think about! I use my camera phone a lot too I find it useful as a visual notebook – to ‘snap’ ideas I might explore in more detail later, for example. But also just to capture little moments that you might not normally if you don’t always lug your camera around with you.

      Thanks for your comment and looking forward to reading more of your blog!

  3. Pingback: The Sunshine Award: Given to “bloggers who positively and creatively inspire others in the blogosphere” « Corporate Skirts

  4. 🙂 glad I found your blog it truly wonderful work.

    Your photos are the best example I have found to what my own understanding of phenomenology and Heideggers thought is. It’s in many ways descriptively more apt then a philosophical piece or written work.

    It would please me if you looked at my post in my blog called ‘Flugwesenheit’. In this post I am trying to extend on Heideggers thought and combine the ideas with Deleuze and Guattari.

    • Hello! Thanks for your comment I’m so glad you enjoyed my photographs and found they are successful as a visual ‘description’ of phenomenology. This (in part) what I am trying to achieve in this blog, and ultimately, in my photographic work. I’m afraid I’m not as well versed in Heidegger, or philosophy in general as I would like to be, but I find his words speak to something essential inside me. I find the same with other philosophers/cultural critics/writers like Benjamin, Bachelard, Barthes and de Certeau especially. I am not so familiar with Deleuze and Guttari. Thank you for directing me to your blog; German is an excellent language for making up words – I love the idea of ‘flugwesenheit’. Are you a philosopher/student/teacher? I couldn’t find any info on your blog – Emily

      • Hi Emily,

        Thank you for your visit and comment. I will reply to your via your ‘sign-up’ in ‘destinations’.

        Cheers joseph

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: